Intellectual Property in Advertising

In a recent discussion with an agency managing director they were again talking about the value of their ideas and how they should be remunerated for the value of these ideas.

I have two problems with this:

1. As you will hear in this interview with Trevor Choy of Choy Lawyers, there is no copyright in an “idea”. Copyright and IP exists in the works produced from the idea.

2. The advertisers usually assumes that they have paid for the value of the IP in their existing remuneration. That is why there is usually a clause assigning all IP to the advertiser on payment of the agency fee.

If agencies want to be paid for the value they create then they need to carefully consider how this value can be calculated and what will they risk, just as the advertiser takes a risk, to achieve a greater reward for success.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

About Darren Woolley

Darren is considered a thought leader on all aspects of marketing management. A Problem Solver, Negotiator, Founder & Global CEO of TrinityP3 - Marketing Management Consultants, founding member of the Marketing FIRST Forum and Author. He is also a Past-Chair of the Australian Marketing Institute, Ex-Medical Scientist and Ex-Creative Director. And in his spare time he sleeps. Darren's Bio Here Email: darren@trinityp3.com
This entry was posted in agency remuneration / compensation. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Intellectual Property in Advertising

  1. Don Tolep says:

    This blog is simply smashing. In my humble opinion of course. As this post is rather debatable I don't think all your blog visitors are going to agree with it.

Comments are closed.